LATEST ARTICLES
Local realities stymie dreams
30 September 2011
There is a touching naivety about national politicians. As they write their
speeches, flesh out their "vision", they begin to believe they can reorder a
complex world with simple solutions.
In contrast, local politicians and officers see complexity. They understand the
rough edges of policy, the unintended consequences. This reality gap
between the national and the local was evident in Liverpool this week as
Labour began to develop its local government policies.
Read full article on the Guardian local government network
____________________________________________________________________
The headache of public health
23 September 2011
As the health reforms near the end of their parliamentary journey, many
councils have yet to get to grips with their imminent responsibility for public
health.
The tasks involved are wide-ranging and touch on every aspect of a council's
work – housing, transport, leisure, disadvantaged families, local businesses,
infants and children, community safety, the elderly and much more besides.
Read full article on the Guardian local government network
____________________________________________________________________
Trying to decide localism funding
16 September 2011
As MPs make a brief return to parliament before dispersing to the annual
drinking marathons that are the party conferences, the Commons' public
accounts committee has been passing the time unpicking the impact of the
government's localism policies on how money is spent, and who is held to
account for it.
The Labour chair – big-hitting former Islington council leader Margaret Hodge
– made her feelings clear on how the Department for Communities and Local
Government distributes its cash to councils: "Nobody can really understand
anything that comes out of DCLG in terms of rationality."
Read full article on the Guardian local government network
____________________________________________________________________
Localism, what localism?
9 September 2011
The government is developing a disturbing habit of making a lot of noise
about granting councils new freedoms, which never materialise.
This has happened twice in the last few weeks. First there was the
announcement by Nick Clegg at the Local Government Association
conference that two councils would be used as a test bed for pooling all the
public service funding in their area, assessing the impact on service delivery,
particularly for the most chaotic families.
Read full article on the Guardian local government network
____________________________________________________________________
Planning reform - start digging
2 September 2011
Local government is currently embroiled in solving two of the economy's
biggest problems - achieving growth and building more houses. Common to
both is the planning system. The government regards slashing regulations in
order to make it easier and quicker to build homes, factories and offices as
crucial to getting the economy moving and addressing the housing shortage.
Read full article on the Guardian local government network
____________________________________________________________________
Celebrity culture in town halls
26 August 2011
Is celebrity culture about to engulf local government? The suggestion by Ken
Livingstone that Eddie Izzard could be the next Labour candidate for London
mayor highlights the political culture shock that could await towns and cities
opting for mayors in the referendums next May.
Livingstone points out that the public knowing your name and face is far more
important than having the backing of a political party.
Read full article on the Guardian local government network
____________________________________________________________________
Smoking gets another kicking
24 August 2011
Four years after the ban on smoking in public buildings was extended across
the whole of the UK, libertarian hackles are being raised again, this time by
local government moves to ban it outdoors.
The localism bill, soon to reach the end of its parliamentary journey, includes
a "power of general competence" allowing councils to act in the interests of
their communities, unless that action is prevented by other law.
Read full article at the British Medical Journal
____________________________________________________________________
Councils should lead riots debate
19 August 2011
Local government needs to get a grip on what ministers are planning in the
wake of the riots before it is too late. We will soon have populist, trigger-
happy police commissioners who will be encouraged to deploy plastic bullets
and water cannon. The home secretary, Theresa May, is considering curfew
powers.
Read full article on the Guardian local government network
____________________________________________________________________
Where were leaders during riots?
12 August 2011
It has been a bittersweet week for local government. Widely praised for the
speed and dedication with which staff cleared up after each night of rioting,
many councils felt they were sweeping away the wreckage of three decades
of community work.
But this is not a return to the 1980s. This week's trouble in Brixton was
started by a group hanging around after the annual Brixton Splash reggae
festival, held on the newly rebuilt Windrush Park, next to where the Black
Cultural Archive is being developed. This is no urban wasteland stripped of
civic pride and culture.
Read full article on the Guardian local government network
____________________________________________________________________
National Trust provokes Neill
8 August 2011
The government seems to have learned nothing from its forced retreat over
plans to sell off the forests. Massed ranks of green welly wearers, in the form
of 3.7 million National Trust and Campaign to Protect Rural England
members, are mobilising to oppose their reform of planning policy.
The government proposed new National Planning Policy Framework – which
would slash the pages of guidance from 1,300 to just 52 – would lead
councils to make planning decisions under a "presumption for development".
The National Trust is organising its members against the plans and
encouraging its many thousands of visitors to follow suit, while the CPRE is
planning to attack David Cameron personally for reneging on promises he
made to them to safeguard the landscape.
The response from local government minister Bob Neill verges on the
unhinged. According to the Sunday Telegraph he has caricatured the
concerns of the rural lobby as "a carefully choreographed smear campaign by
left-wingers based within the national headquarters of pressure groups".
"This is more about a small number of interest groups trying to justify their
own existence, going out of their way by picking a fight with Government."
This is a foolish response to the legitimate concerns of a powerful lobby with
deep roots in the Conservative Party. The Big Society may not grab their
attention, but the merest hint of unchecked despoiling of the countryside will.
Respecting their views and offering reassurance would surely be a better
strategy than implying the National Trust is in the grip of a Trotskyist clique
bent on confrontation.
Neill's attack is similar to that of health secretary Andrew Lansley a few days
earlier, when he accused the King's Fund think tank of "talk[ing] down the
NHS" after they made some reasoned and moderate observations on health
policy. If ministers are this sensitive to criticism after little more than a year in
office, what are they going to be like by 2015?
____________________________________________________________________
Running transparency gauntlet
5 August 2011
The public consultation launched by the Cabinet Office into open data marks
another lurch forward in local government transparency. Having the ingenuity
and thick skin to navigate the ever more exposed world of local government
is fast becoming a core skill for managers and staff.
Read full article at the Guardian local government network
____________________________________________________________________
Resist manager slashing
29 July 2011
An all party group of MPs has exposed the fallacy of indiscriminately driving
down public sector pay and slashing management.
The Commons' public administration select committee's report into
government IT procurement – unsubtely titled Government and IT: a recipe
for rip-offs, time for a new approach – exposes vast waste within the £16bn
annual IT spend.
Read full article at the Guardian local government network
____________________________________________________________________
Pickles’ flawed local revolution
22 July 2011
As parliament rises for the summer, how much success is communities
secretary Eric Pickles having in remoulding local government?
His early months in office were characterised by him using the "bully pulpit" of
his office to try to impose change. His attack on "town hall Pravdas" has had
success... The experiment in councils sharing chief executives is imploding.
Read full article at the Guardian local government network
____________________________________________________________________
Devolved NHS issues first decree
16 July 2011
"The headquarters of the NHS will not be in the Department of Health or the
new NHS Commissioning Board but instead, power will be given to the front-
line clinicians and patients. The headquarters will be in the consulting room
and clinic." So proclaimed the health white paper a year ago.
Last week's paper from NHS chief executive Sir David Nicholson on
developing the NHS Commissioning Board showed health secretary Andrew
Lansley had been misinformed – the board is unquestionably the new NHS
headquarters.
Nicholson's plan is awash with evidence of how the serious flaws in Lansley's
plan to hand commissioning power to local GP consortia have backfired,
leading to the recreation of a heavily centralised command and control health
service.
While MPs and peers are busy abolishing strategic health authorities and
primary care trusts through the Health and Social Care Bill, they are being
reincarnated as the regional and local arms of the commissioning board, with
a staff of 3.500.
The whole tone of the commissioning board's role has changed from
supporting, overseeing and holding to account to directing and controlling.
The new paper certainly states that the board will ensure clinical
commissioning groups "have the freedom to deliver improvements in
outcomes for their local populations in a clinically led and bottom up way". But
taken as a whole the plan leaves little doubt that the national board will have
a strongly controlling role.
The paragraph on working with local government is a giveaway in terms of
the centralising culture the board is imposing on the healthcare system.
It could have said that the board will work closely with local government to
ensure the work of clinical commissioning groups meets the specific health
needs of the local area and ensuring effective integration with social services
and other local services, while also ensuring national health standards and
priorities are met.
What it actually says is: "[elected] Local government will need to work closely
with the [unelected] board to ensure there is strategic coherence and
alignment in how the board seeks to deliver its priorities in partnership with
the wider public sector and at national and local level.”
The great tension in the new healthcare system is the conflict between
upwards accountability to the National Commissioning Board and horizontal,
local accountability – meeting local health needs and collaborating with the
council's health and wellbeing board to fulfil the aims of the Joint Strategic
Needs Assessment.
For NHS staff and GPs it is not difficult to work out whose priorities will be
attended to first and who will win if they are pulling in different directions.
____________________________________________________________________
White paper naive about reform
15 July 2011
The open public services white paper superficially has much to commend it –
increasing transparency and accountability by publishing performance data,
putting power in the hands of individuals through personal budgets and
vouchers, freeing up the resourcefulness and expertise of council staff by
allowing them to take control of services.
Read full article at the Guardian local government network
____________________________________________________________________
NHS and new era for healthcare
13 July 2011
The survival of the NHS is again being questioned. As the service reels from
cuts and the wreckage caused by the latest political masterplan, doubts are
being raised about how long the NHS can survive in its current form, offering
free care for all at the point of use. So what does the future look like for
healthcare?
Read full article at the Guardian
____________________________________________________________________
Dilnot misses real ageing debate
4 July 2011
Those who see implementing the Dilnot Commission's recommendations on
reforming social care as a solution to the issue of caring for our elderly need
to think again. The commission has done its job in outlining a sustainable
funding system, but there is a far bigger question that needs to be faced up to
and answered.
The current care system meets a basic level of subsistence need, but it does
not, with rare exceptions, address the need to ensure elderly people have
happy, fulfilling and productive lives - whether leisure and education
opportunities, exploiting new technology to overcome isolation and
loneliness, passing on life experiences and wisdom to younger people, or the
simple sharing of the company of others.
This issue of "well-being" was addressed most directly in the report for the
King's Fund by Derek Wanless on the future of social care in 2006. Wanless
estimated that by 2026 the cost of providing a service focussed around well-
being would be £31bn, compared with £24bn for the current minimal service.
But this is about far more than cost. It's about whether leaving large numbers
of elderly isolated and unfulfilled is acceptable for our communities - and in
due course for ourselves. It's about articulating a new respect and inclusivity
for our elderly, both inside and outside our own families. It's about effective
prevention and rehabilitation. And it's about finding new ways - volunteering,
technology, supporting elderly people in helping each other - to enrich
people's lives in ways that they, not the state, decide and that do not impose
unacceptable burdens on the taxpayer.
David Cameron is battling to get traction for the Big Society. With some
imagination he could draw together Andrew Dilnot's ideas with Big Society
themes and the innovations families, voluntary groups and councils are
already putting into practice to begin some public soul-searching about what
faces many of us towards the end of our lives and how we could do it
differently. That could mark the beginning of a sustainable care system which
is about people, not just the costs.
____________________________________________________________________
July to September 2011
Public Policy Media
Richard Vize